(Oriole Park at) Camden Yards

the Warehouse
Originally uploaded by slack13

The Orioles may have one of the most repugnant owners in baseball (the Washington Post used the great phrase "locally loathed") and a team destined to always fall well behind the Yankees-Red Sox spending war, but their home park is still pretty sweet.

I headed to Camden Yards (officially Oriole Park at Camden Yards) this week to watch the Seattle Mariners, who are geographically much closer to my heart than these East Coast teams. I'd heard people rave about Camden Yards, but to be honest, I expected to be underwhelmed. Camden was the first in the new breed of parks, the stadium to end the ugly concrete era, but 15 years later half the teams in the league play in a stadium designed to rip off Camden's once-unique architecture. I figured this meant it would now inevitably feel somewhat diminished, its unique character absorbed and diluted by too many imitators.

A friend told me, just before I started the drive north, to be sure to get right-field bleacher seats, which he termed "the best seats in baseball." I'm not sure I can completely agree (bleacher seats in Fenway win for atmosphere, behind-home-plate seats just about anywhere win for immediacy, San Francisco's bay view seats win for scenery) but they are pretty damn good. Not only for themselves, but for the area just behind them.

The portion of Eutaw Street adjacent to Camden Yards isn't technically part of the stadium, although it's inside the stadium gates. It has become a pedestrian walkway (open to all when there's not a game going on) bordered on one side by the stadium and on the other by the old Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Warehouse. For games, the street is lined with food and drink stands and merchandise vendors.

The most celebrated of the drink stands is Boog's Barbecue, run by former Oriole Boog Powell. Boog himself was on hand to greet a line of customers and sign autographs. The food proved to be somewhat of a disappointment; $7.25 for a barbecue sandwich is a bit steep (I chose not to shell out an extra 75¢ for the beans and coleslaw sides) especially when the meat is pretty dry. However, it was well within tolerable limits for ballpark food.

Our seats were well above tolerable limits. We walked up and got second-row seats in center field for $15. Unlike some stadiums, the seats ran right up to the outfield wall, putting us right on top of the fielders (an excellent vantage point to watch Ichiro hang out).


The weather walking up to Camden Yards was the same as in a blast furnace; the Orioles announced a gametime temperature of 101 degrees, which was certainly a cheap ploy for sympathy (I'll believe the temperature was that high an hour before first pitch, when we were walking in, but a breeze and the sun going down actually cooled the air off considerable by the time the game started.

The game was marred by some sloppy play early, but the good guys ended up on top (just another disappointment for the home fans). I noticed the Orioles haven't shelled out the money to update the video board or changed the small scoreboards on the facades of the upper deck from lightboards to video screens, as have most other parks. I think that's more a case of cheap ownership rather than hanging onto tradition.

Somehow, Camden Yards manages to capture more of the pure baseball feel than most of the other new stadiums. Perhaps it's the fact it has had a chance to age, but it just feels like there's more character here than in most of the newer ballparks. In Philly and St. Louis, the stadiums are nice, but there's also the feeling that everything is too nice, too shiny, too packaged to really tap into the retro baseball feel the styling is aiming for. Camden Yards, with its warehouse, harsh lines and angles defining the outfield wall and brick-and-steel faces just seems to capture something many stadiums miss.

RFK

The Cheap Seats
Originally uploaded by edwardaggie98

I finally made my way out to RFK Stadium to see the Nationals in late July.

There isn't anything particularly remarkable about RFK. The Saturday afternoon game seemed to have a crush of people on the Metro and walking up to the main gate of the stadium. However, the crowd was well dispersed inside. The announced crowd was just shy of 32,000 in the 56,000-seat RFK (I can't imagine what the crowd outside would have looked like when the Redskins were playing here). Such a crowd will seem larger next season, when the Nationals move into a new 41,000-seat stadium in southeast D.C.

The Nationals did do one thing perfectly. The outfield seats are just $5, which makes a trip to the park an easy decision. It's the cheapest regularly-priced ticket I've seen since coming back to the States. It looked like that $5 ticket could get you a seat anywhere in the house, since I didn't' see any signs of ushers checking tickets. I didn't test the theory; our group talked about moving down, but ended up satisfied in our perch.

The seats are worth $5. There are a few quirks of seeing a game in RFK, not least of which is the fact every outfield seat is in the upper deck. The cookie-cutter stadium's rounded shape doesn't allow space for any lower-level or bleacher seats in the outfield, at least not in the current configuration. The yellow, wood-and-steel seats do feel properly worn. Cracks in the wood show through the paint job. The concrete deck shows its weather-stained age. For me, such touches generally add rather than detracting from the overall experience. Not enough to make up for the generally bland character of one of the last cookie-cutters still used for baseball.

The group for this afternoon game was far more interested the event as a social outing than the game itself, which also made for an enjoyable time. The game, as it was, had few moments of interest until the Nationals scored a few in the late innings for a 3-0 win. Not a positive result, as I was there primarily because the Rockies were in town.

I did notice one glaring absence from RFK. We sat up above the left-field foul pole, so I wasn't sure if it was below me and I just couldn't see it. But on our exit from the stadium, I walked down to the lower deck behind home plate and looked around. Nowhere. There wasn't an out-of-town scoreboard to be found. A deficiency I'm sure will be fixed at the new place.

wedding week - the final post

So here is my last post about the wedding, since it's been almost a month now - probably time to get this up.



Thursday

We drive from the farm to North Forty where the reception will take place and most guests are staying. We reserved most of the cabins for Friday and Saturday night, with my immediate family and some friends coming in on Thursday. As it turned out, a few too many friends decided to show up on Thursday, and sleeping spaces were at a premium. The weekend's shopping (we got too much food) was done during the afternoon. The food was packed away, the accommodations were all sorted out (although I almost ended up without a spot). Then away to Whitefish we went. Kirsten's bridesmaids actually organized a bachelorette party, or at least made of list of who would be around, and invited them to eat and drink. The guys weren't as organized, but it hardly mattered. Everyone piled into cars (we had two volunteers for designated drivers - excellent) then piled into bars. I had the presence of mind to order food before the shots started coming, then no more presence of mind. More drinks appeared - I don't think I bought many. Bars were hopped. Near the end of the night, we found ourselves in a bar with live poker tables. I managed not to lose all of my money. Closing time, we all made it back to the cabins. More drinks appeared, and I remember talking late into the night and then the morning, although I don't know about what. I went to bed slightly after one of our friends woke up and left to get a sunrise picture in Glacier.

Friday
It was a late morning for me, but not late enough. The rest of the family and friends poured in (although it seemed like most ended up coming on Thursday). The morning carried a bit of stress, not helped by the hangover. Kirsten fielded some calls from her dad, who ended up unable to make the wedding (this was known to be a likely proposition, but still caused some stress). Food preparation for the evening's meal started in earnest, with my family putting most of it together. Kirsten and I, along with a few others, headed to Glacier to scout the wedding location and choreograph the wedding. Jobs had been handed out and all were accomplished. The dinner (no rehearsal) was a hit. Friends and family mingled. An uncle was costumed. Gifts were given to my aunt and uncle for their 60th birthdays, and to my mom and dad for their 30th anniversary. A game was played. People retired early, to recover from Thursday night. (Everyone, as far as I'm aware, was in by midnight).

Saturday

The morning was still earlier than I would have liked, but far better than Friday's. Pancake breakfast fortified everyone. We enlisted guest to help erect a large tent for outdoor seating, as well as setting up tables and chairs. Others put together and set up decorations. Food catered for the reception arrives. Flowers arrive. (A small relief, since I made the arrangements). Kirsten leaves to have her hair done. A near crisis - the only real one of the weekend - I realize I forgot the cord to hook up music to the sound system. Kirsten wants music. I want music. I enlist sister's boyfriend to pick up new cord. He does. Crisis averted.
The morning seems to be a lot of rushing around, making sure everything is done. Then iron and put on wedding outfit. It seems all is done, now an hour to kill before heading out for photos. Someone remembers we should eat - good call. Photos are taken. Everyone arrives. (The parking was a worry, but doesn't seem to be an issue). Group portraits are done, everyone mingles. Our lemonade stand (served by my sister and her boyfriend) is a hit. It was 100 degrees Thursday and Friday. Today it's almost cool at 85. Everyone is seated, at 3:30 the music starts. Everyone in the seats pulls out their cameras. Ceremony goes well - music, reading, vows, reading, done. Everyone is invited to wade into the lake, most do. More photos. People head back to the cabins. Kirsten and I take our time, have ice cream at the nearby park village. (They don't have root beer floats. We order a root beer and a scoop of ice cream to dump together. Now we have root beer floats.)
We arrive, reception can start. Toasts, cake, food, keg, wine, talking. People sit inside and out. More mingling. First dance, then no dance (the music was good, but people were more interested in talking and drinking than dancing). Second keg is sent for, just in time. We open presents. More talking. Some late-night dancing when friends hijack the play list. The hall is to be vacant at midnight, so the keg is moved. It was a poor location choice, some of the guests who had intended to be sleeping no longer were after the keg and its attendant loudness were relocated. The frivolity went on into the early morning. Kirsten and I retired at 3 a.m. Reliable sources tell me the keg gave out at 4:30 a.m., when the remaining partyers drifted to bed.

Sunday

I try for an early morning, but I find the work I'd intended to help with is already mostly finished. We try to find places to put all the unused food. Again a morning of rushing, as people try to pack up and say goodbye. We arrange to have lunch with a group of friends. It's a slow-moving crowd. Afterward, Kirsten and I go back to the park with our photographers. We pose for portraits in the scenery for hours. And more hours. Just before the sun sets, we set up camp.

Monday

We plan on heading to Canada (still with our photographers). I realize I packed our passports in a shipment headed back to the farm. Kirsten is worried - we only have drivers licenses. No problem. We get into Canada. Then I'm worried - we see a front moving in, with black clouds, wind and rain. There's a bear at the Waterton visitors' center. The bear crosses the road. We get back on the road, take a short hike and avoid the rain. The front blows over, sun shines. We drive to Cameron Lake. Nice. Another short walk, then back to the townsite. A few drinks at the hotel (no we weren't staying there, we camped down below). Campsite had no fires, but a lot of ground squirrels.

Tuesday

Back to U.S. We drive to Many Glacier. Then we take a short walk. Another bear is there. We see the cinnamon-colored black bear about 30 feet away, looking through a rotten log. My companions are interested in hurrying down the trail. Kirsten and I leave the photographers to the park, and return to the farm.

Wednesday

We try and figure out how to fit everything we've obtained from the weekend into our packs. It's a futile effort, although we managed to fit most of it. Two 40 pound bags each will tax the baggage handlers Thursday when we return to D.C.

education vs. experience

I'm convinced one of the reasons a long international trip is such a rare event for 20-something Americans is the lack of time in the socially acceptable life calendar.

I'm not talking about a few weeks or even a summer in Europe during college. One of the quickly apparent facts when you're staying in hostels in New Zealand or Australia or Asia is the relatively large numbers of English, Australians, Kiwis, Germans, Irish, Dutch, etc., who pack up and travel for months or years somewhere in the post-high school or post-college years.

It's common enough to have slang descriptions. In New Zealand, pretty much everyone was expected to have an OE, or overseas experience. Sometimes it came right after high school, delaying college for a few years. Sometimes it came during or after college. It seemed just as often it came in place of college. The Kiwis could go to Australia and work at anytime or go to the UK once with a two-year work visa. For your career, the choice to go live andbar tend in London was as valid as the choice to go to University, as long as you weren't planning on a specialized career. Or it was a chance to figure out just what you wanted to do before getting to school and being forced to choose a career plan. In England, the same idea is referred to as a Gap Year.

In the States, there is no term for it. There isn't even a concept. You leave high school, you go to college or get a job. You leave college, you better have a job. That, at least, is the general assumption present in most of the conversations about the future when you're in high school or college. When Kirsten and I were thinking about leaving and going to New Zealand for a year, the general consensus from everyone we told was they were envious, but it wasn't something they would even consider.

It also wasn't easy when we returned. I don't know how much having a year off on the resume affected either of us, but it definitely leads to some uncertainty when
you return with no job and no immediate prospects.

In New Zealand, a college degree wasn't as necessary to get into the general business world as it is here. It wasn't always a requirement. Life experience could also work, or even no experience at all; it seemed sometimes places handed out jobs hoping the applicant would figure it out on the job. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but it's a concept hard to embrace with an American work background. Kind of like the standard three-week business vacation around Christmas. (I saw family-owned shops closed in early December, with signs in the door saying they were closed for the holidays and would re-open in mid-February.

It was one more aspect of a generally more relaxed society. New Zealand is nicely isolated from the go-go world of America and Europe businesses. The small population makes the country pretty much an afterthought for multi-national corporations, which probably contributes to the more relaxed business (and general) culture. Not
that I have a job at the moment to compare, but I'm not looking forward to getting back into the U.S. work mindset.

travel costs

I found some notes for blog entries I made while traveling which never got up here. The first one:

I'm not quite sure exactly how some of the people we met while traveling bankrolled their trips. I know people here weren't sure how we bankrolled ours (we worked in New Zealand, had some money saved, and used some credit cards). There were, I'm sure, people whose parents were paying for it. The English just saved up some money and then saw its value double or triple once they started exchanging pounds into other currencies. Other people had obviously laid out money for a round-the-world ticket and then squeaked by on odd jobs and low standards. We met a couple of people who had bought or inherited property they were renting, and using that income to travel.

One German guy we met in New Zealand had an even better system. He'd simply registered for classes. I didn't verify the details, but according to him Germany not only gave him free tuition, but also a living stipend and insurance as a student. So he simply wasn't showing up for his classes, since he happened to be about 11,000 miles away.

zoom

Once we got to Glacier, the weekend rushed by.

It seemed like all sensory input had a hard time making an imprint on my brain. It was hard to remember what people had told me five minutes later; it was hard to stop and take in the weekend. I tried to make time for all 100 friends and family, and in the end felt I didn't get enough time with any of them.
Staying up drinking until the wee hours of the morning Thursday night didn't help; certainly it made dealing with Friday morning tough. But mostly, the sensation was caused by the sheer amount of details and people to deal with. I didn't feel particularly stressed most of the time, but I did occasionally feel overloaded.

I probably didn't have to be. Most of the details were taken care of by others; our extended families took on several chores, and our friends pitched in with free labor whenever we asked. But since I had dealt with setting up much of the logistics and plans I felt I had to at least check on most of it (and Kirsten helped with some of the details I forgot to check on).

In the end there were no major crises, and everything went well. When it was all finished, I just realized I had very little grasp on individual memories of the event. I can pick them out if I try, but the overall impression on my memory is one big blur.

Two of my favorite quotes from the wedding came from friends who weren't even there.

A few days afterward, I checked me email and saw this message from Ryan regarding a blog post my brother Scott wrote:

I saw Scott's blog post, which was abbreviated in the RSS directory to "Today is my brother's wedding. It was a disa....", which I naturally extended to "disaster". I clicked on it with a beating heart, but as you probably know, the word was "disappointment". So I'm glad to hear that it was not disastrous, at least as far as Scott knows.

(And the disappointment was not in the quality of the wedding. It was because my brother couldn't be there, as the Peace Corps decided to send him to Jamaica with some poor timing.)

The other message came just a day ago, from a friend in my old haunt of Hattiesburg.

Welcome back to your life! Not having to plan a wedding anymore may be the biggest single relief in the world.

True that.

more photos, officially

For those of you who would like to see a selection of photos put online by our official wedding photographers, Stephen and Gavin, instructions are below.

You can find the photos at http://www.pictage.com/336470. The event key is:
070707Eklund

Enjoy.

signs

I'm battling to get into the jogging habit. (Sure, it might not be the best activity for me, but it's an activity, and it's one I think I can realistically do consistently. I'm still trying to find an Ultimate Frisbee or softball team to join, but until then, I've got to work with my brain and do what I can.) I had it for a while when I first got to D.C., then a number of trips (not least two weeks in Montana) broke any schedule I once had.

This week I've tried to start again. My first day I made the same mistake I always do when starting - run too fast at the start, nearly collapse from exhaustion five minutes in.
Yesterday, though, I managed to strike a more leisurely pace, one I could maintain for about 45 minutes. For more than another hour, I fought the urge to walk by forcing myself into a few short bouts of running. But after I lost my stamina, the afternoon mostly became about trying to walk the line between getting lost in a new part of town and keeping my bearing enough to return home. Part of me always hopes to get lost, just to figure out the challenge, but I also would just as soon be able to get back to the apartment within an hour of deciding it's time to head on back.

Most of my runs start in the finger of Rock Creek Park behind the apartment. It's easy to get lost in here; there's a number of named trails, but the signage is often lacking. It'll point you on your way, then the trail will pop out of the woods at a street intersection, with no indication of which way to go. It usually takes me at least a couple of tries to figure out where a trail goes once I decide to take it.

I've noticed a general problem with signs across D.C., at least outside of the National Mall area. Bus stops often list fares from at least two increases ago - if someone hadn't told me, I'd have had no idea I needed to get more change ready the first time a bus arrived. The road network to get out of downtown to Virginia is also less informative than I would like; until you've tried a route once, you have no idea just what lane you're required to be in to arrive where you want to go, or even where a particular road will end up.

But in the park, I mind the lack of information less galling. Getting lost is part of the attraction. Yesterday was no real exception - the signs lasted a bit longer than usual, but I still found myself taking random turns on sidewalks after the trail suddenly seemed to disappear.

I hadn't run west yet; I was pleased to find myself at the Potomac River and with the option of taking either one of a pair of trails I'd run into before, at a different spot. I've started to map out some longer routes in my head. Perhaps it'll come in handy if I ever get my bike fixed.

Stephen has put me to shame. Not only did he get a written account of the whole wedding up well before I did, but the writing was good, as well as the photos. I'm not sure I'll be able to compete.

So while I'm still composing my thoughts, go over to his blog post and check out the 29 photos he has up, along with a written account of his weekend as a wedding photog.

down on the farm

Before we actually headed up to Glacier National Park for the big event, we spent almost a week with my family on the farm where I grew up.

As usual for any family gathering, several aunts and uncles on my mom's side (who grew up on the farm) came out to spend time on the homestead as well. This time, there were some extra faces in the July 4 crowd. Some of Kirsten's family, as well as my best man and her maid of honor, came out a few days early to see the farm as well.

This worked out better than I had imagined - it was some of the only real time I felt I got to spend with anyone all weekend. It's sometimes a bit disconcerting to show friends aspects of your life that did not include them, but also always fun to see your childhood haunts through a different set of eyes.

(Although my childhood home has been going through an extended renovation ever since I left 10 years ago - brand new floors throughout, a re-roofing with expansion and a full deck have been added. I think my parents didn't know what to do with all their time once four kids left the house.)

We arrived at the farm one week before the wedding, Saturday night. On Sunday mom invited the town over for an open house/pre-wedding reception (a decent proportion of the town showed up - 30 people). Monday we drove up to Fort Benton for the blood test (Montana forced Kirsten to get tested for Rubella, for some reason). Tuesday the friends arrived, and Wednesday was a party for July 4. The afternoon was spent at my uncle's, 10 miles down the road. Kirsten's nephews and niece stole the show, running around trying to catch chickens and cows, petting the horse and demanding, and getting, a ride on the tractor (the much-anticipated highlight for any 5-year-old).

The crowd moved back to my parents' for the evening, capped off by the fireworks. July 4 fireworks always kick off fairly late back home, since the sun doesn't go down until almost 10 and darkness doesn't set in until closer to 11 in mid-summer. My best man, Tom, had taken the opportunity to load up on fireworks, as had my uncle, and all of them were shot off.

Before the fireworks, Kirsten's young relatives had taken it upon themselves to explore this new farm, as well (of course). The photo above is the oldest, Bradley, carrying stalks of wheat in our back yard.

For those of you looking for a photo:



(Thanks to Steph for the pic).

wedding

As I was waking up the other day, my mind struggled to identify an odd weight on my finger. After a second, it clicked. The lump was my still-new wedding ring.

If I was writing a short story, this detail would serve as a metaphor for nagging doubt, or perhaps realization the marriage was dragging my life down from the heights of my dreams. Or something.

Thankfully, this isn't a short story. The weight isn't a metaphor, it's just an anecdote about my ring being too new for my mind to take for granted. The titanium ring is slightly raised and now prevents my pinkie from nestling up against my ring finger. My mind most often interprets this sensation as a swollen finger - to my pinkie, it feels like my ring finger has been injured and swelled to the point it has lost feeling. To my ring finger, my pinkie is insane. It's just a little bit of metal to haul around, most of the time unnoticeable. I'm sure before long my mind will become accustomed to the ring's presence and no longer bring nerves' signals regarding the ring to my attention.

For now, this marriage thing is new, but the ring is about the only evidence it happened. Well, the ring and the pile of newly-acquired kitchen products we need to find space for. Next month, I'll hopefully be covered under my new spouse's health insurance, which will make a big difference if I need it but none at all to my daily life.

As the wedding approached, many people asked if I was nervous. Generally there wasn't any nervousness, except on a few occasions when I wasn't sure some of the details for the reception would come off exactly right. But it was obvious the questions weren't about the ceremony or celebration itself.

The questions all had an undertone of "are you nervous about the whole idea of getting married?"

It is, of course, a valid question. Any major, irrevocable decision about life's path is bound to be accompanied by some nervousness. Especially if for you, like me, the phrase "growing up" sounds vaguely sinister rather than a goal to be embraced.

And there was some nervousness about the whole big-picture idea of getting married. For me, and, if she was telling me the truth, for Kirsten as well. It didn't happen as the ceremony approached, though.

For me, the real nervousness came not at the wedding, but rather at the proposal. That's when the natural and expected questions came to the fore: Is this really a good idea? What if it goes wrong? Does this mean I have to grow up and quit doing all those irresponsible things I do? (No.) That was a couple years ago. None of those doubts were seriously carried along to the wedding day. The big ones were dispelled over the past couple years, when, as Kirsten said, we've essentially been married anyway. Certainly while we were out of the country we were rarely apart, and we had to deal with the day-to-day details of living together and melding our different life visions together. Now, the only real difference the wedding made is I'm wearing a ring and I can get on her health insurance.

wedding advice

When we were looking into the details of our marriage in Montana we tried to find out who, exactly, could perform the ceremony.

Several people told us anyone could marry you in Montana. This was welcome news, since there wasn't anyone we knew in the area who fit in the traditional clergy/justice of the peace boxes and we didn't really want to hire someone just to do the ceremony.
We did have someone in mind - late in the evening after my brother's wedding, my uncle volunteered to officiate our wedding. I'm not sure he remembered his promise when we called him up several months ago to take him up on the offer, but he graciously accepted and did a wonderful job (complete with showing up to the day-before-the-wedding dinner dressed as a monk or jedi, depending on who you asked).

In the months leading up to the wedding, we realized Montana law did indeed limit who, exactly, could perform a wedding. I don't think my uncle falls into any of the categories, although I'm also fairly sure Montana wouldn't bother to check.

But rather than set us up for a possible headache, we found another provision in the law. Montana allows for a Declaration of Marriage without the need for a license or ceremony. Simply type up a statement which covers the specific details listed in the law, show up to a courthouse with two witnesses, pay the $53, and it's done. (Don't forget to get the blood test first).

I don't think many people take advantage of this option. Chouteau County officials said ours was the first Declaration of this kind they'd ever filed. They were happy enough to do it; they said it required less paperwork for them.



EDIT: I have been corrected. My uncle, is, indeed clergy. So we probably could have been fine under Montana's clause "in accordance with any mode of solemnization recognized by any religious denomination".

He says: The US Government is loath to judge the merits of various churches, so getting ordained through an ad in the back of a magazine is as legit as going to seminary in their eyes.

We were aware he'd gotten a back-of-a-magazine certificate. However, once we found the easy way out, we decided it wasn't worth it to check into how Montana determined if he was, indeed, acting in a manner recognized by "any religious denomination."

in D.C.

I'll get to the wedding posts in a minute, but I'll start by working backward. We arrived back in D.C. on Thursday night after nearly two weeks in Montana. Thankfully, D.C. was kind to us on the first day back. Humidity was at the low end, which made for a beautiful day (it wasn't until yesterday the soul-stifling mugginess returned, but at least we had a couple days to start the acclimation process).
Friday night we also took advantage of D.C.'s summer habit of free events. The National Symphony Orchestra was playing a free evening program outside in the Carter Barron Amphitheater in Rock Creek Park. Concert was good, although the accompanying cicadas were neither on time or in tune.
Saturday we had tickets to see The Decemberists accompanied by the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra. I've been playing the Decemberists nearly nonstop on my iPod for the last few months, so it was a show we'd been looking forward to. The symphony gave even more of an epic feel to their tragedy-story songs (which is most of them). A thoroughly enjoyable evening.
It was a much-needed ease into the return to reality after the break. Yesterday the ease was mostly gone; we spent the day in big-box suburban hell (Northern Virginia) to deal with a few wedding-gift exchanges and to use our new gift cards.

Now that the wedding is over, time to deal with the other two items on my list: figuring out how to maximize the space in our apartment and getting a job. Neither seems particularly enticing.

we're back

The Internet rumors are true - I did indeed get married last weekend.

We're now back in DC, so I'll get some impressions from my two-week trip to Montana (and the wedding) up soon. For now, thanks to everyone who made the trek to Montana or who sent us well wishes.

it's a dry heat

We're in Montana, and the countdown has officially begun - wedding is on Saturday.

Most of the details have been planned, now it's just case of putting the plans into reality and making sure nothing fell through the cracks. People keep asking if I'm nervous - haven't really had a chance to think about it like that lately. All the details can get in the way of the big picture.

I'm mostly looking forward to seeing everybody. My family has started to arrive, and a few friends will show up on the farm before heading to Glacier. Thursday we head north to meet everyone else up at the Park and further stress about the details. Thankfully, we should have a day or two in the park afterward to decompress.

Also have to enjoy ourselves this week. The weather out here beats D.C. - it was close to 90 yesterday, but no humidity means the shade is cool. And it actually gets cooler once the sun goes down. Might hit 100 this weekend - stay out of the sun (especially if you happen to have a hangover, as I'm sure I won't at any point).

what's-it's-name Park

I'm not necessarily opposed to all stadium naming deals. As long as the name isn't replacing a historically significant name and is on the stadium long enough to form a lasting recognition between the name of the stadium and the team which plays there, fair enough.

But there's a few problems with the current spate of brand-new ballparks with brand-new sponsor naming rights.

Stadiums in the first wave of the building boom have already moved on and changed from their initial name. I still think of the stadium in Houston as Enron Field, and I still refer to the Giants' park as PacBell.

The other problem is with so many new corporately-tagged stadiums, the names just blur together. I saw a game in Philadelphia just a couple weeks ago, and I had to look up the name of the stadium when I started to write this post.

The name (Citizen Bank Park) blurs away in my memory, and the park itself generally does the same. It has all the requisite new-retro styling. The concessions are varied and plentiful (and in a nice touch, a decent selection of microbrews are the same price as the big-name standards).

There are a few nice touches. The bullpens are both in centerfield, with the visitors' pen stacked a level above the home pen. When a visiting reliever is called into the game, he has to run down the stairs and past the Phillies bullpen staff to reach the field. Above the bullpens is a standing-room concourse, so fans can perch at the rails and look down at the pitchers warming up. It's like a balcony seat, with a pretty good view of the game as well.

There's also a few confusing touches. Television monitors are mounted above the back of the lower-level sections along the third-base line, so fans in the concourse or the further-back seats can see the action. There are no such monitors along the first-base side, even though the areas are otherwise symmetrical and I believe the price levels of the seats are the same.

I bought an upper-deck seat, but mostly stayed with the standing room crowd. I wandered the stadium, stopping to watch each inning behind the seats of a different section. (Ushers were stationed just about everywhere checking tickets, although I probably could have made it into a lower-level seat long before I actually did in the eighth inning).

The atmosphere reminded me of St. Louis. Same red-clad crowd, same general feeling of a baseball-savvy crowd. There was a surprising crowd of more than 42,000 for a Wednesday afternoon game. In a nice touch, the ushers prevented anyone moving from the concourse into their seating area during an at-bat.

The game was a good one, as well. Tied up late before the Phillies pushed past the White Sox for what was, in the end, an easy win.

details

I'm getting married in less than two weeks. It hit me today: in two weeks, I won't have to deal with any more details, any more getting ready for the wedding. After this, I won't have an endless to-do list to deal with. I might have some evenings free without the specter of details forgotten hanging in the air.

After this, all I'll have to worry about is finding work. Piece of cake.

heat

Hand

Originally uploaded by slack13

The past couple of weeks D.C.'s weather has officially gone from "pleasantly sunny" to "muggy as hell."
It hasn't been as abrupt as that - the first hints of the humidity showed at times, but the next day or so the air would clear and it would just be beautifully sunny, the type of weather that cries for you to go outside and revel in it.
The last couple of days, however, the weather has turned into the type that screams at you to stay inside, and turn on the AC while you're at it. I lasted until early June before even installing our window unit (although we did break down and buy a fan a week or so earlier). Today marks the first time I have needed, and I mean needed, to turn it on two days in a row.
When Kirsten first started to complain about the sultriness of the weather, I was able to laugh it off. After all, I'd just returned from New Orleans. Nothing here in early June could compare to New Orleans (and I don't think, even now, it's reached New Orleans-in-May levels). Now, however, the New Orleans trip has worn off. Even the four years in Mississippi and time spent in New Orleans never prepared me for the onslaught of stickiness summers below the Mason-Dixon line bring. A childhood of the dehydrated air of Montana ensures my body will never accept the continual oozing of sweat from the pores. It'll only be worse, much worse, in mid-July after having a two-week humidity-free vacation in Montana.



A few weekends ago, the weather was less humid and merely brain-meltingly hot. This happened to be the weekend my brother and sister-in-law were in town before leaving the country for a Peace Corps stint. The weekend they decided it would be a good idea to walk from my house to Georgetown, then down to the mall. I wasn't prepared for a three-mile walk with the 90+ degree sun beating down, and the concrete soaking it up and then spitting it back to bake us from below.

Awakening
Originally uploaded by slack13

The next day was a little better. We drove to Hain's Point, where we watched the planes take off from National Airport and clamored about on this big silver guy trying to claw his way up out of the ground.

phone phun

Since moving into D.C. we've noticed an odd phenomenon - when we're talking on a cell phone at our house (where we don't get a real strong signal) and a plane flies over (which happens often, since we're under the flight path to Reagan National) our service momentarily cuts out.
I don't know why a plane overhead would affect signals from the ground-based cell towers. Our only (tongue-in-cheek) theory is the CIA is jamming cell signals underneath planes over DC.

Anybody else got an explanation?

Fire

The day after
Originally uploaded by slack13

Here's a post I just never got around to writing-

Two days after my arrival in D.C. (April 30) a pair of local landmarks burned. The one which caught most of the city's attention was in the Eastern Market. On the same day, the Georgetown Library, just down the street from my house, also caught fire.
I've still never been to the Eastern Market (the merchants are still up and running, although in temporary locations while the building is being repaired). I've never been into the Georgetown Library, either, but I'd certainly planned to. Now I don't know what the closest library to my house is, but it's not within easy walking distance.
I'm not sure if the spate of fires in interesting buildings upon my D.C. arrival bodes poorly for my future in the city.

back in Thailand

Memories of Thailand came flooding back Saturday night. The reminiscing wasn't prompted by a travel discussion, a photo or a similar landscape. The memories were prompted by a bar.
Specifically, Dr Dremo's in Arlington. The lower level of the bar is a dive (although the crowd turns it into a trendy dive) built in the style of Southeast Asia.
I'm sure this isn't on purpose. But the wall-less, roofed area on a concrete slab sets the scene just right. The colored lights and crazy-quilt decorating scheme continues the trend. And the plastic patio-furniture tables and chairs set up on the concrete, sitting in the humid air under weakly turning ceiling fans, perfectly captured the ambiance of just about every Southeast Asia bar, or restaurant, we entered.
Of course, the details shattered the illusion. There was a wide variety of beer, and it all cost considerably more than 80 cents a bottle. It didn't even come in the preferred Asian 600ml bottle, but in plastic keg cups. And once we walked upstairs, the bar transformed into a multi-level pool hall.


Image from Flickr user Furcafe

Saw my first urban deer today, driving into downtown. The doe was just hanging out in a well-upscale yard, grazing away just a few blocks from the park. A bit out of place, but a nice addition to the neighborhood all the same.

Turner Field

Part two in what could be an ongoing series:

For my trip to Atlanta, one of my friends picked up a few tickets to see the Braves take on the Mets. Turner Field made a good first impression - the tickets for the upper deck were on Tuesday two-for-one special, which put them at $4 a seat.

The upper deck seats also pleasantly surprised - although we were only a dozen or so rows below the top of the stadium above third base, the view was decent. We could see the whole field, and the stadium was built up enough it felt like we were looking down on the field, rather than out at it. It's enough of a distinction. I've sat in stadiums where the upper decks were pushed away from the field, and you felt like you were separated from the experience. Turner avoided that problem (although it still doesn't compare to Tiger Stadium, my gold standard for close-to-the-action upper deck seats).

The game was decent - an easy Braves win, but the lead was built up inning by inning, to keep people interested.
It wasn't a perfect day to watch a game - smoke in the air from Southern wildfires made my throat feel like I'd been swallowing sandpaper by the end. The overall experience at Turner, however, was pleasant.
The stadium is, like all the other stadiums built in the last 15 years or so, built on the Camden Yards neo-retro model. Lots of brick and green-painted steel. All nice, but there is only one feature of the ballpark that truely stands out and captures your attention. The center-field video screen scoreboard presented a sight to behold.
Apparently the high-definition screen was the largest in the world when it was installed, or at least is one of the largest you're going to find. The picture is about 80 feet tall and 80 feet wide, and unlike old-school video screens, the picture jumps out at you no matter what viewing angle you're at. (Well, I didn't sit directly in front of it, so I can't vouch for the close-up, directly-underneath view).
The big screen was complemented by something I've noticed elsewhere - in the two years I was out of the country most stadiums seem to have replaced the runs/hits/errors lighted scoreboards that used to sit somewhere on a narrow front of the upper seating decks with similarly narrow video screens. The screens show the scoreboard info during the action, and advertising or promotional info between innings.
The gadget-geek in me loves the high-def screens and video boards. The baseball purist in me isn't sure what to think - the old light boards weren't particularly aestheticly pleasing. As long as Fenway doesn't replace it's hand-operated board (and at least a few of the new parks keep their hand-operated out-of-town scoreboards as an homage) I can't think of a reason to decry the change.

Here is a wonderful essay on the character of New Orleans from a New Yorker writer who is writing a book on the city post-Katrina. Essentially, he talks about how the tyranny of time prevalent in most American's lives has far less of a hold in NOLA. It's certainly worth taking the time to look through the archives of the rest of the blog.

The essay reminded me of an observation I'd been struck by after we'd spent some time in the cities of Southeast Asia. New Orleans is often described as the "most European" of the U.S.A.'s cities, because of its unique character and French and Spanish influences, especially in the pedestrian-friendly (also a phrase you can't use very often in the States) French Quarter.
To me, however, the description doesn't quite fit. New Orleans, for better and for worse, is the closest thing the States has to a third-world city. The decay-inducing intense humidity, the cracked streets, the political system - these would be some of the "for worse." The easy-going lifestyle, the very loose adherence to time and appointments, the day-to-day absurdities which force you to laugh and loosen your own interpretation of what needs to happen - these I would include in the "for better."

FEMA trailers

FEMA trailer
Originally uploaded by w0bbly

A point I feel needs to be made:

The phrase "FEMA trailer," heard often on the post-Katrina news about New Orleans and Mississippi, conjured up an image in my head of the mobile-home type of trailer. The type which takes -wide as an adjective: single-wide, double-wide, triple-wide. The trailer of the trailer parks I know and make fun of.

No. The unfortunates who live in the FEMA trailers as a home of last resort have a trailer, a vehicular appendage which can actually be towed down the road.
It's a shocking sight to see streets lined with a FEMA trailer in every front yard. To see the lengths of PVC pipe on the outside forming a semi-permanent plumbing system, and to know in some cases this will be semi-permanent housing. Many of these trailers have been called home for more than a year and a half, and in what I assume is a weighty proportion of cases, the residents will have little option but to call them home for the foreseeable future.
At least when you see the FEMA trailers parked in the front yard of a flood-damaged house you know the residents have a chance of moving out of the front lawn and into the house at some point. Far more depressing are the FEMA trailer parks. Rows upon rows of the trailers parked on lots of white gravel, fenced in by green-mesh-covered chain link.

FEMA
Originally uploaded by yellowjacket186

One day I watched a couple kids run along the row of gravel between the trailers and realized they probably have no home to hope to move into. Perhaps their house was washed away. Perhaps they were renting, and the post-Katrina housing crunch has priced them out of the market. Either way, they are likely to spend a lot more of their childhood playing on gravel and sleeping in a mid-level RV.

happy birthday to me...

Gumbo at Liuzza's.
Dinner at Jacque-Imo's.
Rebirth at the Maple Leaf.

All good.

NOLA

I've spent a fair bit of time in New Orleans. I lived in the city for one glorious, liver-damaging summer. My post-college job was 100 miles north, and I made sure to spend as much time down in the city as I could. I spent most of my time in the French Quarter-to-Uptown crescent of the city, the oldest part of New Orleans and the closest to the Mississippi river. This is, of course, the part where all the tourist highlights are, but it also incorporates plenty of local neighborhoods and authentic New Orleans character.
I tried to get out and see the rest of the city, as well. Driving the streets, taking random turns, seeing the areas I never had reason to visit. There are few cities as easy to get lost in as New Orleans; the streets have no 90-degree angles or grid pattern. When I lived here, I had experiences of trying to simply go around a block and ending up in the city's suburbs before I could re-orient myself. This is maddening when you are trying to find something in particular, but a quite agreeable trait when you want to soak up the city.
Before Monday, however, I'm fairly certain I'd never wandered into the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans. The area gained national infamy during the Katrina coverage as one of the hardest-hit areas after the levee breaks.
Before heading to the Ninth Ward, I'd gotten a feel for just how raw the Katrina damage, how much the devastation must continue to affect daily life for so many people. On the train ride in, driving around town, I saw the rows of houses boarded up, gutted, abandoned. I saw residential blocks with rows of FEMA trailers in every front yard.

Ninth Ward, New Orleans
Originally uploaded by Harrison414

But nothing I saw compared to the sheer devastation present in the Lower Ninth above Claiborne. Nearly two years after the disaster, much of the debris has been picked up. Streets are not lined with houses, not even damaged houses. Streets are lined with weeds, through which you can grab glimpses of concrete foundations, steps which once led to now-missing houses. Blocks might have one, or two, or three house shells remaining, serving to accentuate the missing. This was once a residential community. A community with problems, with poverty, but a community with people and with homes. Now it's a ghost.

Much of my old New Orleans is up and running. The old and relatively high-lying areas around the river - the French Quarter, Downtown, the Garden District, Uptown, Magazine Street - look much as they did before the storm. The Superdome and Convention Center leave no clue of the horrible days the displaced endured there. There are signs of the storm - every other building on Canal Street remains boarded up, as do many elsewhere. A tourist in town for a few days, especially one in town for the first time, could leave with the impression New Orleans has put Katrina behind.

In a way, it's a shame so much of the damage occured so far from the New Orleans the rest of the country knows. The tragedy New Orleans endured and is enduring, has, I think, faded from the national consciousness. Outside, Katrina was a tragedy, was a horrible thing.
Inside New Orleans, you can tell, it still is.

Originally uploaded by mr_nightshade

One of the few things about the States I missed in my time overseas was a good cheeseburger. Thanks probably to the global fast-food chains, hamburgers are on the cheap-eats menu everywhere, at least in the English-speaking world, but perhaps also because of the global fast-food chains, something gets lost in the translation.
I ate plenty of burgers in New Zealand and Australia, and not one left me satisfied. There was a variety of reasons, usually starting with the meat - it seemed the ground beef was more often than not cut with with soy protein or some such thing to bulk it up. Even if the meat was right, there was always something off, such as the sweet-rather-than-salty ketchup Down Under. Apparently the just-right combination of a ground beef patty with cheese melted into its very essence topped with a lightly grilled or toasted bun and accesorized with some mix of toppings, just isn't one easily hit on outside the States.
(I did find one great burger during the 15 months we spent overseas. It was in north Thailand, of all places, at a little burger counter opened by an American Vietnam vet.)

I've had a chance to catch up on my burger shortage. In Atlanta I nearly had an overdose. The "Coronary Bypass" at the Vortex wasn't even close to the biggest or best burger I ate last week.

The Ghetto Burger at Ann's Snack Bar is not only the largest single object of ground beef I have ever eaten. It's more than a burger, it's an experience.
For one thing, you can't just waltz up and expect to grab a burger. Ann, who has been running the Snack Bar for about 35 years, serves the people sitting at the nine stools inside. If you get there when the stools are full, as I'm sure they always are, you wait until there's a space. We arrived at 3 p.m. There were about eight people ahead of us waiting to get inside. We finally made it to one of the coveted stools around 4:15.
(As the lady waiting next to us said when a couple bailed after waiting about 15 minutes: "You got to want it.")
Once we took our seats, it was another 45-minute wait for the burgers. This wasn't due to lack of service, it was because the burgers were made to with care. Patties at least two inches thick covered the entire grill. Onions were grilled, buns were toasted, bacon was deep-fried (I knew I would love the finished product as soon as I saw the raw bacon loaded into a fry basket).
When we finally were handed our Ghetto Burgers, we had in front of us a double-cheeseburger (each two-inch think patty must have weighed at least three-quarters of a pound) topped with bacon, onion, lettuce and, wonderfully, chili.

I finished the burger. My body complained for the rest of the day. It was totally worth it.

(And I'm not the only one who thinks so.)

the dirty south

My week in Atlanta was mostly a culinary tour of the city. I was more interested in hanging out with friends that I hadn't seen since well before I left the country, so I didn't feel a need to hit up all the tourist sites.
I did do a fair bit of driving around the city, though, and I was struck by the very different character of different spots in the city.
Here's how Atlanta appeared to me: islands of new, wealthy, trendy or commercial areas surrounded by seas either of wooded residential neighborhoods or the grit of the poorer, urban, mostly black Atlanta.
Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed Atlanta. The stories about its rapid growth over the last decade or so rang true - it seemed much of the city was either under construction or had obviously been built recently. The interstates were strained by the traffic load even at 2 p.m. It is spread, or sprawled, out but this also seems to lead to several different neighborhood areas carving out their own identity.
Riding around Atlanta I found it difficult to keep my bearings; every trip from one area of the city to another seemed to require driving through winding, wooded streets before popping out at whichever business district we were looking for.
Downtown is a big more straight-forward, but once you get out of the high-rise corridor, you run across the gritty underbelly of the South's population hub.


I didn't completely miss out on Atlanta's sights - we spent time at the High Museum of Art, caught a baseball game at Turner Field and walked along the street where Martin Luther King, Jr. was born, now a National Historic Site. The houses on the block are generally well-kept and newly painted, although even here the processes which have led to the blight of the inner city and explosive growth of the suburbs are at work; the house next door to MLK's childhood home is abandoned.

I've been in Atlanta two and a half days, and my only impressions of the city so far is this: the food seems designed to kill rather than nourish.
Today I ordered a meal that was listed on the receipt thusly: "1 coronary bypass, med."

And today was actually a detox day. After meeting up with friends in D.C. Friday night and lots more friends here in Atlanta Saturday night, being behind on sleep and going out for a while again last night, a detox day was needed. Mostly, I think more sleep is needed.

Tomorrow, I'll venture into the city rather than just the bars and apartments of friends. At least that's the plan.

There are lots of things about New Zealand I took for granted while I was living there and had forgotten about. Living in the States again has highlighted some of the little differences again, such as the Kiwi practice of everyone always thanking the bus driver when they get off a city bus.
Riding around in D.C., I just can't imagine anyone doing such a thing. I'm also not sure what the response would be; probably suspicion on the more local bus lines. Today I did see bus drivers patiently helping out tourists, which I wasn't expecting. Some of the grateful tourists thanked the driver, but those don't count in terms of the point I'm trying to make here.
I guess the point is, I'm far more rude here to my bus drivers when I leave their bus, at least if total indifference on both our parts is judged as rude.

An uncle visiting New Zealand reminded me of the country's native Moa, one of the largest birds of all time but which is now extinct.

However, Te Papa, the National Museum of New Zealand, has recreated what they think the Moa's call sounded like, based on the size of its neck and vocal cords and other factors.

Hear the Moa here.

ferry fun

As the porthole exploded inward and I was drenched with a couple gallons of sea water, shipwreck movies were running through my head. When the ocean starts to crack the windows and flood the ship, it's time for the characters to panic. A few of my fellow passengers were eager enough to pick up the cue.
About all I could do was sit there, muscles tensed, clutching the armrests of my seat and watching as a skinny Thai crew member was nearly bucked off the bow of the ship as he lashed a sheet of metal over the hole where a window used to be.
On our way in to Koh Pha-Ngan the ferry ride was no sweat; it was a relief after an overnight bus ride from Bangkok. After a couple of nights partying and days doing exactly nothing on the island, it was time to head back to Bangkok and finish our time in Southeast Asia.
The morning weather on the island was fine. I didn't notice the rough seas until we got on the boat - a modern catamaran accommodating more than a hundred people. The route was in two hour-long steps: Koh Pha-Ngan to Koh Tao, another island off the Southeastern Thailand coast, then on to the mainland.
As soon as we left Koh Pha-Ngan, the boat was rocking in five-to-10-foot swells. Just big enough to throw me into my first bout with seasickness. I managed to avoid any personal food expulsion, but when we pulled into Koh Tao I was fighting nausea. During a layover on Koh Tao I popped a seasickness pill (a great decision) and my stomach decided it didn't need to scream at me anymore and settled into a sulking grumble.
By this time the sky had turned gray and a few short downpours had all the passengers huddled with their luggage in the snack bar or under the waiting area's roof. The scheduled layover dragged on, and word spread the boat from the mainland - which would take us to shore - was running late.

Eventually we loaded up. The rain forced the crew to move all luggage inside the passenger compartment, rather than the normal practice of piling it on the front deck. As the ferry pulled away from the dock, it became apparent the wait had only intensified the waves. The swells now were 10-15 feet, and every time the boat rose up on a wave, it violently slammed down into the water on the other side. It felt like we were constantly being picked up and dropped a few feet onto a parking lot. The boat shuddered on every landing, then made another rapid ascent up the next wave. In the brief instant of weightlessness at each peak, my stomach kept going up even as the rest of my body started to drop with the boat. Each parabola of rise and fall also propelled me up off my seat, and then back down, unless I physically held myself tight to the chair.
Eventually, the impacts took their toll - the plastic casing around some florescent lights at the front of the cabin came loose, crashing into a group of already-nervous passengers. One girl in particular ended up with more of her blood outside her leg than she would have preferred. Just as the crew had gotten her panic attack under control and moved her to the rear rows of the cabin, a far more alarming wave hit.
Instead of hitting this wave head-on, the boat was at a bit of an angle. The front right corner led as the boat tilted down into a trough, and the boat was stilled dipped when the wave crashed over the corner of the deck and up into the front of the boat with enough force to blow out a window. That's when I became soaked with saltwater and starting thinking about shipwreck movies, as well as the two-paragraph stories on ferry sinkings in developing countries; the deaths always well outnumber the survivors, by about 100 to 1.
The people across the aisle from me had pieces of glass coating them, along with sea water. Those passengers who weren't simply stunned by the event voiced some concern.

"We're going to die!"
Comforting to all, of course.
"We must go back!"
This one gained some traction among the group; we were only about 15 minutes into the trip and could still see the dock behind us. The Thai crew did their best to talk everyone down, although most people shouting were more interesting in voicing their opinion than listening to anyone else. A few individuals defused the crowd by pointing out the captain was likely better qualified than the screaming passengers to make such a decision. The captain, above in his cabin and unseen by the passengers, did make one concession to the situation by slowing down considerably. With a bit less momentum, the boat avoided any more waves breaking into the boat. The crew passed out doses of menthol oil which served two purposes: for one, it was calming and seemed to combat both seasickness and the low-level anxiousness which the roiling sea induced.
It also masked the scent of the passengers whose seasickness got the better of them; once one or two passengers' stomachs sent their contents outward, the urge was contagious. It also wasn't helped by the seasickness bags the crew passed out, which happened to be clear plastic.
The hour-long trip instead took more like two and a half. The surreal sense of the whole trip was only heightened by the TV monitors playing "Deuce Bigalow: European Gigolo" in the corners of the cabin. Although I suppose it was better than "Titanic," or "Poseidon."




There is a postscript to this story. Our journey from the islands to Bangkok was supposed to take about 12 hours, putting us in Bangkok around 11 p.m. that night. Instead, the tropical depression off the coast delayed and slowed our ferry, which meant we missed our bus connection. We ended up arriving in Bangkok at about 4 a.m. We had no room reservation (a concept that doesn't exist in Asian backpacker budget accommodation). We walked along the backpacker area and found a room available for about 800 baht, or $20. Instead of taking it, we searched for another 45 minutes until we found a room for about 500 baht, or $12.50. A month in SE Asia will seriously screw with your cost-comparison calculations. We seriously felt the first room was simply too expensive to even consider, even though we were exhausted and it was 4 in the morning. Instead, we sacrificed an hour of sleep - when we knew we'd have to check out of either place in the morning - to save about eight bucks.
It didn't even strike us as unusual at the time. In a month traveling around Thailand, Laos and Cambodia we probably paid an average of $7-8 a night for accommodation, and that's double beds and private rooms, not the dorm beds we paid $20/night each in Australia. In SE Asia, most restaurants posted their menu (in English) outside. After a week or so, we'd look at the menus, and if any one item cost more than the equivalent of $2.50 or so, the place was too expensive and we'd find somewhere else.
Then, in Iceland, we stayed at the Salvation Army, in dorm beds, in separate rooms, and paid the equivalent of about $40/night each for the privilege. If we wanted blankets, it was an extra $7/night.

One year ago...

...I was complaining about the lack of central heating in New Zealand.

And we were preparing to leave Wellington for the final time. Doesn't seem like it's been anywhere near a year. We went driving around the city, exploring a few corners we hadn't seen in our months living in the city, and checking out a little-used viewing area of the city.

Downtown Wellington from Tinakori Hill









I still have a ton of stuff from our trip I've been meaning to get up here. I realize I need to do it quickly, or it's going to lose even more relevance. At this point, it's more to help out my own memory. So hopefully I'll put up a few travel dispatches from places I didn't get to blog about at the time.

I'm also going to be taking a shorter trip soon - this weekend I'm flying to Atlanta to see some friends there and in New Orleans/Southern Mississippi. Back in D.C. in June, then have to seriously start worrying about getting a job (and our upcoming wedding).

i love living in a city, but...

Last night we ended up out late. When we got home, it took me literally an hour to find a spot to park the car.
Even better, our temporary parking permit expired yesterday. While we wait for our new license plates and registration to arrive from Montana (so we can get a longer-term temporary permit) I'll be moving the car every two hours today to comply with our neighborhood's parking regulations.

(narrow) roads of the world

During the year in New Zealand many differences between there and here faded from my notice as "there" became "home," at least temporarily. But I never stopped marveling at the difference in the open roads. Even the major roads in New Zealand can turn into narrow, winding mountain roads. And the road is liable to turn into a single lane anytime there's a bridge of any kind, even if the bridge in question is just a few feet long and crossing a stream. At least the NZ road authority is nice enough to put up signs warning you of every one-lane bridge, and telling you exactly who has the right of way when you and another car arrive at opposite ends at the same time.



And there is, as you can see, at least one bridge in the country that with a single lane caters to two-way automobile traffic as well as the occasional train. (Trains always have the right of way).

Then we left New Zealand, and found the roads progressively get narrower. From New Zealand's one-lane bridges, we went to Scotland's one-and-half lane roads.

One-lane road with passing places
Originally uploaded by kopretinka.

The Scots do provide plenty of passing places, or spots just long enough for a car and just wide enough for two cars. In some lengths of road, there are so many passing places one side of the road appears to trace a sine wave.

Nevertheless, Ireland tops them all. The Irish just pave a lane one car wide, put stone walls on each side with no shoulder or margin of any kind, and then just throw them open to traffic in both directions. There were places I was afraid I was going to scrape both sides of my car on the rows of stacked stone, and that was before I met someone coming the other direction. I got lucky in Ireland; unlike some New Zealand trips, on the Emerald Isle I never had to back down a road after meeting another vehicle in order to reach an area wide enough for the both of us.



The entire time I was driving the Conor Pass part of my brain was filled with curiosity about what, exactly, would happen if we met another car. Another part was dreading an encounter. Most of my brain, however, was occupied with trying to keep the car on the narrow road as we wound up the hills in a dense fog.
Ireland's highest mountain pass might not stack up with the high-altitude drives of the Rockies. But the Irish certainly put a decent degree of difficulty on the whole thing.

a secure, undisclosed location

I now live about 1/2 mile from Dick Cheney. Not that you'd know it without doing some research. The house of the No. 2 executive is harder to get close to than his boss' house.
The grounds of the US Naval Observatory, where the Vice President residence is located, is completely fenced off and all entry points are guarded. That's not so surprising. The fact you can barely catch a glimpse of the house from the street isn't surprising. This being DC, the fact there is no sign or other acknowledgement it is theVP's residence is a bit surprising.

The real surprising thing is that you can't even see the place online. At least not with Google maps or Google Earth. Yahoo! maps still has the area in high resolution, at least last time I checked.

back in the day

Old Baylor Park-6
Originally uploaded by jmtimages.

In contrast to the previous post...

(The lowest I remember is filling up for 79.9 cents a gallon in St. Louis in college - sometime around 1998).

i'm glad I live on a bus line...

DC Gas prices
Originally uploaded by Focused.

In abstract theory terms, I don't necessarily think higher gas prices are a bad thing (although it'd be nice if there was some sort of infrastructure to allow more people to get by without using gas first).
However, it's a little bit of a shock to see prices jump 15 cents in a week. When I got here, I filled up in DC for $2.959/gallon, a price that was a few cents lower than most stations in the area. Today, I put in a few gallons at $3.099 per, a price I was happy to see - it was at least 10 cents below anything else I saw. (And I actually found that price in Maryland).

Rock Creek Park

Rock Creek Park
Originally uploaded by Mad African/Appler!.

It's also a little fun to walk out of your house onto a city park trail, and see that it's technically a National Park. Where all the neighbors are walking their dogs.

what i've learned today

When you're fat and out of shape, here's a tip if you'd like to run for more than five minutes at a time.

Start Slower.

the rest of the tour

So below you can see one shot of my street - here's a few more.
We're a few blocks off the businesses of Wisconsin Ave, and a few one-way and dead-end streets set the area off from the traffic. In the photo there's actually available parking, which isn't the case once the sun goes down. And I'm not looking forward to the headache coming up as we try to get a permanent parking pass.

The basement we're inhabiting isn't quite big enough for all our stuff - most of which has been packed up since we left the country in late '05. At the time, we thought we cut down all our possessions. Now I don't know where we'll put it all, especially since our closet is about a foot wide. I did get the important stuff worked out - the computer, TV and stereo are all hooked together after a run to Radio Shack for $25 worth of cables. So my clothes are all over the place, but I can download, watch and listen all through electronic entertainment bundle.

Our basement falls in the middle of a block of row houses, which I'm sure look nicer now than they will in November.

On the other side, where the entry/exit point to our humble basement actually leads, is the alley, and on the other side Whitehaven Park, part of Rock Creek park, which takes up most of North-central DC.

Today I made up my mind to go running for an hour in the park. I made it about 5 minutes. I was actually out moving in the park for an hour, but I only managed to run about a quarter of the time. Bad showing. Since I've got no real employment to worry about, I guess I'll have to work at that.

The neighborhood

The neighborhood
Originally uploaded by slack13.

Gotta say, this is a good time of year to get to DC. It was in the mid-80s yesterday, but no humidity yet, and stuff is flowering everywhere. Doesn't hurt we're a few blocks off a main strip but tucked away out of the traffic and our apartment back door opens onto a park.
I understand it's not always this nice - few people brag about DC's wonderful weather. But it makes for a nice introduction.

in with the new Busch

Caught a game at the new Busch Stadium yesterday, pushing the stadium total to 14 (a number that should jump rapidly soon, since I've only seen a game at one east coast stadium.

None of my Cardinal fan friends have been overly enthusiastic about the new stadium. Essentially on the exact site as the old one, the new Busch was designed with the same "retro" aestethic as every other new stadium since Camden Yards. The biggest knock against the old stadium, from a fan's perspective, was that it was a cookie-cutter round cement structure, just like the ones in Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, and other cities that built stadiums in the 60s or 70s (I'll have a chance to revisit the cookie-cutter look soon, at RFK). The biggest knock on the new park is, as one of my friends puts it, it's a "new Cookie-cutter". Since the elements designed to give the park "character" are the same as every other new park out there the park actually is devoid of any character.

Valid point. But I still prefer the new park to the old one. Got to see a day game in the bleachers yesterday, even if the weather wasn't perfect. Clouds hung in the sky most of the day, and the ninth inning was broken up by a 49-minute rain delay. The temperature reading behind home plate stayed in the high 70s, though, and for a few of the mid innings the sun beat down.
I reached my seat with a $5 hot dog and $8.50 beer in hand and looked around the stadium. Granted, there isn't any unique distinguishing feature to this park. But the brick facade and iron roof supports rising above the upper deck just look nicer than the old concrete ring of arches, even if every other park uses them.
Just being shiny and new and having 11 different kinds of concession stands will wear off. In 20 years, there might be calls for a new park as this stadium style falls out of favor. But it's going to age at least as gracefully as the Old Busch, and probably a little bit better.
For my money, there are two very important reasons this stadium is better.
1. It's obviously a baseball park. By the time I saw a game at the old Busch they'd torn up the artificial turf, put a grass bank in the outfield as the hitter's backdrop (a feature kept in the new park) and set up a shrine of rememberance in a few upper deck centerfield sections, featuring the team's Championships and retired numbers. They made it look probably as nice as you could make a cookie-cutter stadium look. But that didn't change the fact it was orginally built as a multi-purpose stadium. And it didn't change the most glaring deficiency of the old Busch, which was fixed with -
2. You can see out of the new stadium. The tiers of seating decks, skyboxes and club sections wrap around the field from foul pole to foul pole, but the pile of seating decks has breaks, visual interupptions, to allow spectators some view of the surrounding city. St. Louis has one iconic view - the arch. Now you can see it from parts of the stadium. The only place you could see the arch from the old stadium was if you climbed to the top row of the upper deck and looked out. This sounds like a small thing, but to me it's important for a stadium to have some sort of geographical identity. The new stadium might now have much unique character, but neither did the old one, and at least now you can tell with a glance which city you're in.



(A last point: Busch Stadium policy allows fans to bring in their own drinks, and I believe food. But the only place this is mentioned on the Cardinals website is on an "A to Z" guide of Busch Stadium under the letter I. For inspection (of bags). Obviously not a policy they're hoping people stumble upon.)

a plan

My work on the Springfield, Mo., ice storm disaster-recovery effort is done. (At least as officially as it can be - they never really tell you when you're finished, you just go "on call." But it's in the last gasping stages, and there's almost a zero chance of more work for me).
So I'm headed up to Columbia this weekend to relive my glory days. Then back to Springfield to finalze packing effort, then next week head to DC with stops in St. Louis and Indianapolis (hopefully a game at the new Busch will be involved). Then I'll land in DC just in time to ... well, at this point I have no idea what I'll be doing in DC. Looking for work and ways to earn money. Exploring the city, and reaquainting myself with the tourist spots I saw years ago. Piling through a to-do list that has built up since I just couldn't get myself motivated at the end of 12-hour days (or even the shorter ones). Perhaps a little road trip thrown in for good measure.

a destination, anyway

Almost five months after our return to the country, we've finally moved past crashing with friends and family without an idea of where we'd finally settle.
Kirsten landed a job in Washington, D.C., and that's where we're going next. (Well, she's already there. I'm hanging onto the job here in Missouri as long as I can, then heading east as well).
I still think of myself as someone whose rightful place is on the West coast, but I just keep moving further and further away. I think I'll manage - I'm happy to be heading somewhere where the metro population can be expressed in seven digits, rather than five.

the seasons, in the wrong order

When I started working this job in Springfield - early February - a few days started in the falling snow. It jumped straight from winter to summer; the last two weeks the temps have broken 80 a few times.
This week it decided to return to spring. We've gotten 45-55 temperatures and lots of rain. The problem is, after spending a few weeks touching the 80s, this feels a lot more like fall than spring. My internal thermostat has already been spoiled.